2 September 1898
Ansar under Abdullah al-Taashi approx. 52,000, 5 guns
Anglo-Egyptians under Sir Herbert Kitchener, 25,544, 115 guns
Weather: Clear, hot
Location: 15° 46’ 12” N, 32° 32’ 48” E, the site of the battlefield, now largely covered by the town of Al Jarafa and an airfield on the left bank of the Nile River, is about 7 miles north of the Khartoum suburb of Omdurman in Sudan.
First Light: 06:15 Sunrise: 06:37 Sunset: 19:02 End of Twilight: 19:23
Moon Phase: 95% Full Moonrise: 20:23
(calculated for the location and date from U.S. Naval Observatory)
Omdurman and the whole history of the Mahdist war from 1881 to 1899 is, to me, evidence that the current chaos brought on by Muslim extremist movements like Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS in the Middle East, and Al Shabaab and Boko Haram in Africa, is not a new thing. In fact, if you read history, you'll see the current wars as part of a broader, recurring pattern in Islamic history, which is punctuated by fundamentalist movements. These are frequently initially sparked by religious revival but given momentum by anti-imperial, anti-infidel, or sectarian anger--to the detriment of ordinary people, sadly, mostly to ordinary Muslim people. Of course, to be fair, this is also a pattern in Christian history and probably the histories of other religions. So I don't want to beat up on Islam. But religious wars are a factor in human history. This particular battle, however, was lop-sided, both in terms of the cause of each side (one religious, the other imperialist) and in terms of technology (one swords and spears, the other machine guns and high-explosive artillery).
Map of initial positions of the Anglo-Egyptian Army and the opening attacks by the Ansar just before dawn. Narrative continues below the map.
A little background first.
Mohammed Ahmed "The Mahdi" |
Of
course, the religious fundamentalism that fueled the Sudanese revolt
was only part of the general discontent with the maladministration of
the corrupt and incompetent Egyptian government. But Ahmed and the "end-times" religious fervor he preached gave
focus to the movement. From 1881-1885 this revolt led to a largely successful
military campaign by the Dervish Ansar (an Arabic word meaning "helpers") that ended with the fall of the Sudanese provincial
capital at Khartoum and establishment of a "caliphate" in Sudan.
While
Britain was busy imposing its imperial will on Cairo, the Mahdist revolt in
the Sudan was taking advantage of the chaos up north and sweeping across
Sudan. In 1883 the new puppet government in Egypt sent a hastily-trained,
ill-equipped, dispirited force of conscripts (mostly former mutineers and some
Sudanese irregulars) under a few British officers south to deal with the disturbances. This force was predictably massacred by the Ansar in the
desert at El Obeid in late 1883.
After this embarrassment, Gladstone, under pressure at home, reluctantly sent local hero Colonel Charles George Gordon down the Nile to Khartoum in early 1884 with express orders to evacuate the Europeans
and Egyptians there. That was all he was licensed to do. Instead, Gordon, who had had prior experience in the Sudan in a campaign to wipe out slavery in the province, thought he could count on the loyalty of the grateful Sudanese tribes to whip the Mahdi. So, in violation of direct orders from Her Majesty's Government, he fortified the city. After a long siege and ineffectual rescue expedition, Khartoum fell to the Mahdi's
forces in January 1885. And with it, Gladtone's limp government.
Prime Minister Gladstone's government
in London, at first reluctant to get involved in internal troubles in
Egypt, was then forced to in order to protect its vital strategic
interest in the continuing operation of the Suez Canal,
which British banks had been the primary investors in. It first had to
send an army to put down a coup d-etat by the Egyptian Army over the
Ottoman colonial regime (Battle of Tel-El-Kebir,
1882), then reorganize the Egyptian government, and finally reform the
same Egyptian Army it had defeated. From that point on, British
diplomats and officers took on Ottoman titles and assumed the executive
and administrative roles in the Egyptian government and armed forces, a role that was to
continue for the next 70 years, until another Army revolt in 1952. And so on...
But Gordon became a martyr in the cause of British Imperialism, to be later played by the scenery-chewing Charlton Heston in the 1966 MGM blockbuster, Khartoum.
Sudanese veteran in the "patched" jibbah of a Dervish jihadi. The design of this uniform was to supposed to symbolize the vow of poverty that the devout Dervish took. |
The shame and outrage generated by his brave stand and martyrdom was to influence the direction of British policy in the Sudan from then on. But they were, at the moment, not in a position to conduct any expeditions, at least until they'd reorganized the Egyptian government and retrained the Egyptian Army.
For the next thirteen years the Mahdists, also known as Dervishes, consolidated their theocracy in Sudan. They ruled over the Sudanese with brutal severity, comparable to the severe regime of the Islamic State in parts of Syria and Iraq today, or the Taliban in Afghanistan. It was also shortly after the conquest of Khartoum that Mohammed Ahmed was called to paradise by Allah (1885) and his lieutenant, Abdulla al-Taashi, assumed the office of Khalifa as his successor.
During this period, the Khalifa did not do very much in the way of building an effective government in the Sudan to replace the ousted Egyptians. For the most part he spent the decade putting down rebellious tribes in Darfur and Kordofan, fighting off an Abyssinian (modern day Ethiopia) invasion, and remotely attempting a half-hearted foray into southern Egypt. Mohammed Ahmed's original goal had been to lead a jihad across the world. But that conquering sweep lost momentum with his death. The Khalifa wasn't a leading type. Instead. he decided to prepare for what he calculated would inevitably come, an attempt at reconquest by the Egyptians and British. And that finally started in 1896.
The campaign to retake Sudan finally gets going.
Beginning in 1896 the new Tory government in Britain under Lord Salisbury felt it had the political mandate and economic wherewithal to methodically take back the Sudan, and once-and-for-all end the threat of the Dervish jihad sweeping up into Egypt or down into its colonies in East Africa. It was also feeling pressure from other European colonial powers, like the Italians, the French, and the Belgians, who were making inroads into Sub-Saharan Africa. Salisbury's aim was to make the entire Nile British, from Alexandria to Uganda and Kenya. By this time, too, the British felt that their retrained Egyptian Army was ready to take on the Ansar.Giving the overall command of the campaign to Sir Herbert Kitchener, a rising hot-shot in the Army who had been given the office of Sirdar (Commander-in-Chief) of the Egyptian Army, the British allowed him more-or-less free reign in his strategy. Rather than attempting an overland invasion of Sudan from Suakin on the Red Sea coast, which faced the problem of water, Kitchener decided to move up the Nile in a series of stages. This would not only allow him to insure sufficient water for his army (always the most strategic consideration in desert warfare), but would allow him to use the Egyptian Navy's gunboats to support his operations.
In early 1896, with his regular British troops still on their way, Kitchener began to attack the Dervish forces in north Sudan with only his Egyptian and Sudanese regulars. These proved to be more than equal to the task, overwhelming the strong, entrenched Dervish garrison at Firket (see strategic map above) on 7 June and winning another hot battle at Dongola on 23 September, securing the Nile up to and including the 3rd Cataract.
These native troops were to prove to be Kitchener's strongest asset. And the repeated victories they won--particularly the Sudanese regiments--reinforced their morale. These were not the timorous troops that had let themselves be slaughtered by the Mahdi's jihadis thirteen years before. In fact, after each early victory in this campaign, captured Sudanese from the Ansar enthusiastically enlisted in Kitchener's victorious regiments, with their smart uniforms, modern weapons, plentiful food, and regular pay. Word had got around who the winning side was going to be.
Kitchener spent the remainder of 1896 building up his forces and stocking his magazines. At the beginning of the next year he started a railroad from Wadi-Hafa directly across the desert to Abu Hamed, above the 4th Cataract of the Nile. At first, the Dervish forces defending Abu Hamed raided the construction crews, but the main force, moving up the north bank of the river, physically hauling the gunboats with them, sent out another commando of trusty Sudanese, who took Abu Hamed and slaughtered or recruited the enemy there. By October, the railroad was up and running all the way to Berber, just a couple of hundred miles north of Omdurman. He had also managed to bring nine gunboats past the 4th cataract, each armed with new fast firing modern guns (12 pdrs and 5" howitzers) and the new Maxim machine guns, making them powerful floating support batteries as the army marched close to the river.
The Khalifa, alarmed at the inexorable advance of Kitchener, early in the next year sent two of his most aggressive emirs, Mahmud Ahmed and Osman Digna, with 15,000 men up to the Atbara River to stop the Anglo-Egyptians. Actually, this move had been Mahmud's idea, which he'd been pressing on the Khalifa for months.
But as Mahmud marched north he veered farther to the east to attempt to outflank Kitchener at Berber. Losing his nerve, he eventually took up a position on the north bank of the mostly dry Atbara River at the hamlet of Nakheila, digging in to await the Anglo-Egyptian attack. A big mistake.
Emir Mahmud after Atbara with his captors, soldiers of the either the 9th or 10th Sudanese Regiment.. |
Final march to Omdurman
Kitchener, after sitting out the hottest part of the summer sipping gin and tonics in Berber, awaiting resupply and the arrival of the rest of his British troops (Grenadier Guards, 2nd Rifle Regiment, Northumberland and Lancashires, as well as the 21st Lancers and the rest of his artillery), set out on the west bank of the Nile on 23 August for the final push toward Omdurman.The troops mostly marched at night to avoid the heat. On their left, they were supported by the river fleet, nine of the latest gunboats, each armed with the new quick-firing 12 pounders and howitzers and Maxim machine guns. On their right, the useful Camel Corps and the cavalry covered the desert flank. All of the brigades assumed a formation which allowed them to quickly form square in the event of a Mahdist attack. MacDonald's Sudanese brigade marched ahead, setting up a zariba-protected camp for the army at the end of each march. Along the east bank, a growing force of irregular locals tribes, each with a grudge against the Mahdists, and led by a courageous Major Whortley (courageous because the tribes' loyalty could flip again at any second), made their way down toward Khartoum.
Ansari jibbah with its emblematic patches. These would have been a wide variety of colors. |
On 1 September, Kitchener's army had arrived at the village of El Egeiga, about five miles from Omdurman and within site of the domed Mahdi's tomb there. There they set up their usual semi-circular camp. However, the scrub was not as dense around the camp and there were only enough thorn bushes to slap together a zariba on the south side, where the British brigades held the line. On the north side the Sudanese and Egyptian regiments dug shallow trenches instead, which, it would turn out, were far better protection.
Kitchener wanted the Khalifa to come out and attack him, where he was confident his superior firepower would annihilate the Ansar. What he didn't want was a prolonged siege of Omdurman, with costly house-to-house fighting. While he was well supplied and confident of victory, he wanted it over with after two years.
To provoke Abdullah to come out, he sent his gunboat fleet upstream to bombard Omdurman, like kicking over an ant's nest to bring out the swarm. The navy did a thorough job of this; first knocking out all five of the forts that protected the approach to Omdurman along the Nile, then breaching the wall of the city in several places, and finally demolishing the sacred dome of the Mahdi's tomb. This sacrilege was designed to enrage the Dervishes and make them come out onto open ground. It was not a nice thing to do.
Mahdi's Tomb, after the bombardment on the 1st. |
Meanwhile, over on the eastern shore, Whortley's irregulars overwhelmed the Dervish positions opposite Omdurman and the ruins of Khartoum at the confluence of the Blue and White Niles. They were not nice in the way they did it, either. Because of this the navy was also able to land a battery of howitzers on the right bank to bombard the city and persuade the Khalifa that it would not protect him. What defensive artillery the Ansar had was not very effective since it was manned by captured Egyptians from the fall of Khartoum thirteen years before who, according to Winston Churchill's report, had been chained to their guns so they wouldn't run away. So their hearts couldn't have been in it. These were all quickly put out of action by accurate naval gunfire.
But the Khalifa was not in Omdurman after all. Persuaded by his emirs that a defensive position had not worked in any battles of this war so far, he concluded that an all-out attack by his entire army was the best course. This aggressiveness had been what had brought the Mahdist victories against the Egyptians, Gordon, the Italians, and the Abyssinians. With God's help and with the Mahdi's inspiration he would present the unbelievers with another massacre on the scale of El Obeid and Khartoum years before.
Cavalry had been sent out from the Anglo-Egyptian army to look for the enemy and alert Kitchener when they came out of Omdurman. Patrols from the 21st Lancers (with Churchill tagging along as a freelance journalist) and Broadwood's Egyptian cavalry discovered that the open country beyond the Jebel Surgham and the Kerreri Hills was already seething with tens of thousands of Dervishes, all marching north (see map at top). The Khalifa's entire army was coming.
The cavalry patrols watched the Ansar army all night, ready to alert of a night attack. The moon was nearly full and on the desert it was a bright night. The British fully expected that the Khalifa would take advantage of this to neutralize the firepower advantage of the Anglo-Egyptians. But the Khalifa did not order a night attack. Electric searchlights from the gunboats, which had returned from their bombardment expedition at Omdurman, continuously panned across the Mahdist positions, looking for any sign of movement. This new bit of Western technology may have unnerved the emirs enough to think that it was not worth the risk of confusion a night assault would bring. As it turned out, Adbullah's plan for the attack was complex enough without having to try and pull it off in the dark, even under a full moon. He probably felt that his greatest chance of success was to launch an all-out attack at dawn after a restless and sleepless night for the terrified (he assumed) infidels.
Comes the dawn.
As the eastern horizon began to grow purple, the 52,000 men of the Dervish force began to more. Sunrise wasn't until 06:37 but at 05:50 it was light enough for the thousands of men to make their prayers, gather around their banners, and start their assault. The British, Egyptian and Sudanese regiments had been up since 04:30 and were in position behind their zariba and in their trenches with full ammo pouches and bayonets clicked in. Broadwood's Egyptian cavalry and Camel Corps were dismounted and in position among the rocks of the Kerreri hills to the northwest of the main camp, watching for a move from that direction. They also had with them four 6 cm Krupp guns of the Egyptian horse artillery.
As I said, the Khalifa's battle plan was complex. It was to happen in two phases. The first attack was to be in the center. Osman Sheikh ed-Din's 27,000 men were to race headlong across the plain into the center and right of the infidel camp. It was to be a run of about 3000 yards. The sheer fury of the charge was to make the ground rumble and so demoralize the enemy that they'd flee in the face of it. This tactic had always worked before against the Egyptians.
Meanwhile, a smaller force of 5,000 under the emir Ali wad Helu, which had made its way to the northwest behind the Kerreri Hills during the nigh,t was to make a surprise attack from that direction.
The Khalifa and his bodyguard, with a second army under his brother Yaqub, about 17,000, would be in position behind the Surgham Hill ready to support ed-Din's main attack if it succeeded and make a second charge if it was checked.
I don't know about you, but this sight certainly scares the willies out of me. |
Battles never go as you plan them.
12th Sudanese in their trench at Omdurman. The Kerreri Hills, can be seen on the horizon, from where Osman Sheikh al-Din's attack would swarm. |
To his left, Osman ed-Din noticed that the black rocks of the Kerreri hills were covered in Egyptian troops and artillery (Broadwood's cavalry and Camel Corps). His men were already taking fire from the flank. He knew he couldn't leave his flank and rear open to Egyptian cavalry. So he split his force in two, taking some 15,000 men north to take care of this force. He left 12,000 under the fire-eating Osman Azraq to continue the frontal charge against the infidel zariba.
Another regiment of Sudanese infantry awaiting the Ansari attack in their shallow trench.
Broadwood makes himself the bait.
Meanwhile, as Osman ed-Din charged northeast after the Egyptian cavalry and Camel Corps on the Kerreri Hills, their commander, Broadwood, realized his 1,700 men could neither stop this tidal wave nor use their mounted mobility to out-maneuver them. The rocky slopes were not great for mounted action and were even worse on camel feet. He had received a heliographed order from Kitchener to withdraw back into the zariba, but he decided on a more strategic ploy. Realizing his Camel Corps could not outpace the onrushing Dervishes on foot in the rocks, he ordered them to mount up and make for the northeast corner of the zariba by the Nile as fast as their cranky beasts could carry them. He then ordered his nine Egyptian cavalry squadrons to mount up and make a fighting withdrawal to the north, drawing off the Dervishes from the main army. This they did in a series of bounds; riding a few hundred yards, dismounting to fire some volleys, and remounting to ride on, repeating this a number of times. Ed-Din took the bait and led his men in a wild chase after the elusive cavalry. Some of them went after the Camel Corps, picking their way down hill toward the zariba, trying to cut them off.
Two of the gunboat commanders in the fleet (gunboats Melik and Abu Klea), able to see what was happening to the north, took it upon themselves to steam downstream and take up firing positions close to the shore of the northeast corner of the zariba. Here they unleashed hell on the pursuing Dervishes, covering the safe withdrawal of the camelmen into the safety of the allied redoubt. The jihadis, seeing they would be cut down to a man by the massed firepower of the gunboats' artillery and machine guns, as well as those of Lewis's brigade behind the northernmost line, halted their pursuit and took up sniper positions in the rocks on the Kerreri ridge.
The bulk of ed-Din's force, however kept trying to catch Broadwood, who led them miles north of the battlefield at a critical time. After a couple of hours Broadwood looped around and led his regiment along the banks of the Nile back into the zariba. Many of the Dervishes tried to cut them off but in turn were cut down and driven back by the protective pair of gunboats.
A Glorious Charge
After this initial charge by the Khalifa's Ansar had been halted, and ed-Din's force seemed to have gone far off in pursuit of Broadwood, Kitchener ordered his men to take time to refresh themselves, restock with ammunition and clean their rifles. He was concerned that the surviving Ansar would attempt to retreat back into Omdurman to fortify it. So he ordered Col. Martin and his 21st Lancers south to reconnoitre and cut off any disorganized Dervishes from getting into the city.
Twenty-four-year-old Winston Churchill in his brand new khaki kit. |
Making their way south towards Omdurman, the four squadrons of the 21st noticed about a hundred Dervishes shooting at them from the cover of a khor (a gully, remember). They formed up in line of three squadrons abreast (one in reserve) and made ready to charge. In textbook fashion they increased their pace from a walk to a trot to a canter and finally to a gallop. As they neared the edge of the khor, however, the officers in advance saw that it was filled not with a hundred snipers, but thousands of tightly packed warriors, all armed with very sharp pokey things.
Unknown to the British, the khor was early occupied by about a thousand Haddendoa's of Osman Digna's east Sudan tribe. As the initial attack on the Anglo-Egyptian center collapsed, the Khalifa dispatched another 2,500 men under Osman al Sharif (called the Kara Army) to reinforce Digna. So by the time the 400 troopers of the 21st discovered them there were over 3,500 fanatical Dervishes packed 12 deep awaiting them. But it was too late to stop the charge, which was now at full gallop with lances leveled.
The Charge of the 21st Lancers at Omdurman by William Barnes Wollen, 1899 |
The 21st, in this their debut of combat in war, lost 70 men and 119 horses killed and wounded, out of their original 400. Churchill estimated that the Arabs had suffered about 200 casualties, though I'm sure he didn't go back to ask. But he was there in the thick of it, so we can't discount his estimate.
Instead of charging back through, which would have been suicidal, Col. Martin prudently had his regiment turn by fours to the right and trot over about two hundred yards to the eastern flank of the Dervish force in the khor and there dismount to begin pouring an enfilade fire into its flank. At this point the Kara Army and the Haddendoah had had enough and retreated back up the gully toward the Jebel Surgham.
Where do you think you're going? The battle is far from over.
As I have pointed out, Kitchener was anxious that the fleeing Ansar not retreat into Omdurman. He did not want this battle to end in a costly house-to-house fight. So besides dispatching the 21st to cut them off, he also ordered his entire line out into the plain to the south and west to interpose his army between what was left of the Mahdist army and Omdurman. This meant that the army was supposed to form up in echelon south. He also ordered Collinson's Egyptian brigade, which had been held in reserve that morning, to make a route march along the river bank to follow the 21st into the city (see map below). As we'll soon see, this was kind of a reckless move on the Sirdar's part, exposing, as it did, his individual units' flanks as they spread out.
But the Khalifa was not retreating back into Omdurman. As you'll recall, he had a Plan B should his initial attack fail. And he was executing it now. Seeing that the enemy had left the shelter of their trenches and zariba and had spread out on the plain, he rubbed his hands together and concluded that the time was right for his nasty surprise; a second massive attack with a completely fresh army. Supporting this attack he sent a few thousand of his own rifle-armed Sudanese up onto the rocks of Jebel Surgham to pick off the exposed British. And he also sent frantic messengers up to find Ali wad Helu and Osman Sheikh ed-Din beyond the Kerreri Hills to join this last all-of-nothing charge from the north.
Jebel Surgam |
To their right and isolated by several hundred yards, MacDonald's brigade (the elite 9th, 10th, and 11th Sudanese and the 2nd Egyptian) held their own against the attack from the west. After about twenty minutes, this attack seemed to be losing its momentum. But at the worst possible moment, a new army of Dervishes began to swarm from the north over the Kerreri Hills. It was the 5,000 of Ali wad Helu and the wayward 15,000 of Osman Sheikh ed-Din. Attacked on two sides by a total of 36,000, MacDonald's 3,600 Sudanese and Egyptians nearly emptied their cartridge pouches. As the attack from the west seemed to be waning and the one from the north came closer, MacDonald deftly shifted his left-hand battalions to the right, forming an "L". It was getting desperate. Then, just as his men were down to their last two or three cartridges and the brave Sudanese (and the 2nd Egyptian) fixed their bayonets to counter-charge the mass of Dervishes rushing toward them, Wauchope's Highlanders finally showed up and began to deploy to the right of MacDonald's brigade. More gun batteries and Maxims also came up and unlimbered, pouring it into the Dervishes. Collinson's Egyptian brigade, recalled from its march south, and Broadwood's Egyptian cavalry and the Camel Corps also showed up on MacDonald's right to help beat back ed-Din's attack. And within about ten more minutes, the Dervishes had come to a halt (either dead or retreating) less than 100 yards from MacDonald's line. But it was a close thing.
Now it was over. Kitchener's brigadiers rallied their battalions and the whole army resumed its march south to capture the capital. Broadwood's cavalry and the 21st Lancers were sent to the west to interpose themselves between the fleeing Dervishes and the city, and prevent them from rallying. For the most part, however, these Mahdists were no longer Mahdists. They were spent and were more interested in getting themselves and their families back to their home villages. They'd had enough of the caliphate and war.
They welcomed us as liberators.
There were a few last-standers in the mud houses of Omdurman and two lone martyrs defending the ruin of the Mahdi's Tomb, but these were quickly killed or captured. The mood of the civilians of the city was fairly jubilant at being liberated from Mahdist tyranny by their countrymen, the heroic Sudanese regiments. Kitchener was politically astute in leading these regiments first into the Sudanese capital. But hundreds of civilians, including women and children, had died horribly in the naval bombardment the previous day and their bodies were decomposing rapidly in the heat.A number of correspondents remarked on sickening smell.
Kitchener also had the pleasure of personally liberating some 30 shackled European prisoners from the Khalifa's prison. There was much weeping since most of these had been there for well over a decade. But I'm sure they smelled in their own way, too.
Then, on the 4th, taking an escort of his trusty Sudanese infantry on a gunboat across the Nile, the Sirdar also visited the ruins of the governor's palace in Khartoum where Gordon had been killed thirteen years before and presided under the raising the Union Jack and the Turkish...I mean Egyptian...flag.
The raising of the Turkish (okay, Egyptian) flag and the Union Jack over the ruins of Gordon's palace in Khartoum. |
The body count of Omdurman was equally lopsided. One rough estimate is that the Mahdists lost 28,000 killed, wounded, or captured. There were undoubtedly many thousand dead on the vulture-peppered battlefield. Of the allied casualties, the official toll was 291 KWM, including 45 dead (Featherstone) or, according to Barthorp, 482 total casualties. At any rate, it was comparatively light considering the force had been attacked by an army of 52,000. Of all of these, 71 casualties were from the 21st Lancers alone, due to their heroic but foolish charge into the beehive of the Kara Army hiding in ambush. There were four Victoria Crosses awarded for Omdurman, three in the 21st Lancers alone. Not bad for their first battle.
- For Churchill, his lucky participation in this charge brought him tremendous political capital back home, allowing him to start his fast rise to power. It uncannily matched Teddy Roosevelt's charge with the Rough Riders up San Juan Hill exactly two months before. Both men used their heroic military feats in cavalry charges (albeit on foot for TR) to great political advantage.
- And as another side note, thirty years later, Churchill's American mother, Lady Randolph, who had got him the gig with the 21st Lancers (using, ahem, influence on the Prince of Wales, her lover), died as an eventual result of a freak fashion accident while trying to negotiate the stairs in her stately home with a new pair of high heels. She fell and twisted her ankle, which became infected and gangrenous to the point that her leg had to be amputated. The bad luck (and, I would maintain, medical malpractice) continued; in spite of her wealth and influence, she never recovered from this surgery. She died in great pain a few weeks later. Though I'm reasonably certain she wasn't eaten by vultures. A cautionary safety lesson about wearing high heels in stately homes.
Where were we?
Oh yes, the Khalifa, meanwhile (wearing much safer flats) made his way south to his homeland in Kordofan with what was left of his loyal followers. Kitchener sent a force of Sudanese infantry after him and he was run to earth at Um Dibaykarat in the southern Sudan in November 1899. Apparently
The bodies of the Khalifa and his bodyguard at Um Dibaykarat. Sudanese soldiers, who ran him to earth, are in the background. |
Almost right after the battle, having done with his British troops, Kitchener sent them home to parades and honors, leaving the mopping up of hold-out Mahdist forces in Sudan to his Egyptian and Sudanese troops. All of this was finished by the end of the century (i.e. New Years 1900). Having had enough of Africa himself for the moment, Kitchener went home before all of this was done to receive his lordship from a grateful Queen Victoria, a cash prize of £30,000 (worth about Ten Billion Bucks today...actually $45 million as of today's exchange rate), lots of wining and dining all over Britain. He was the hero of the century. Or at least of the year.
An Assessment
In retrospect, what mistakes were made at Omdurman? Granted, the military power of the contestants was pretty lopsided. The Mahdists had a two-to-one advantage in numbers, but they were completely out-gunned and out-organized in every other conceivable category of military power. You can't get more asymmetrical than the Omdurman campaign. However, it was not a foregone conclusion. The Khalifa might have won. And Kitchener could very well have suffered the fate of Gordon.
Firepower
Firepower was clearly in the allied camp. The Anglo-Egyptian army was equipped with the latest in artillery, small arms, and ammunition. Some historians have armed the British infantry in the Sudan with the Lee-Metford magazine-fed, bolt-action rifle. While this was still a black-powder weapon (meaning it would have enshrouded a firing line in choking smoke), it had a max range of 1,800 yards, a ten round magazine, adjustable sites and was capable of laying down an incredible amount of fire on a distant mass target like 17,000 Dervishes. My own research has indicated that most of the crack infantry (in which I'd count the regiments present at Omdurman, like the Grenadier Guards) were already being given the smokeless-powder version of this rifle, the Lee-Enfield, which was to become the standard British infantry weapon until the 1950s.The Egyptian and Sudanese troops were armed with the older Martini-Henry (the infamous rifle of Isandhalwana legend), a single shot breechloader using black powder ammunition (which would have obscured the target from a firing line after just a few rounds). However, by 1898 the Martini was a rugged, reliable weapon with a max range comparable to the Lee-Metford and a rate of fire of 12 rpm. While the Dervishes were able to get closer to the Egyptians and Sudanese regiments than they were to the British, they were still stopped dead at several hundred yards. One lone, old man carrying a flag was said to have staggered to within potato-chucking distance of MacDonald's brigade, only to have been shot down clutching his flag, bless his heart.
Maxim gun with two man crew, note the ammunition belt coming out of the left side. The cylinder around the barrel was the cooling water tank. |
The most common weapons available to the Mahdists were edged weapons; spears and swords. While effective in close quarter combat (as they were against the Abyssinians), the men had to actually get close enough to use them. And in the face of modern artillery, magazine-fed rifles, and machine guns, this was problematic.
Leadership
If the Ansar had any chance of winning Omdurman, it was in leadership. The Khalifa himself was not exactly a military genius, but he had several brilliant commanders under him; namely Osman Digna, Osman Azraq, Ali wad Helu, and others. They were capable of astute tactical decisions, strategic thinking, and inspiring leadership. What they didn't have was effective communication system on the battlefield, and had the timing of Osman Sheikh ed-Din's return from his wild-goose chase above the Kerreri Hills coincided with Yaqub's attack from the west, it is very likely that the battle would have been a massacre for Kitchener.The Sirdar, posing for his Monty Python portrait. |
On the battalion level, in fact, the professionalism of the officer corps in the Sirdar's army was some of the best in the world, both in the British regular regiments and in the Egyptian and Sudanese regiments. The Sudanese, in particular, had superior company officers and NCOs (like Lt. Hussein of the 9th Sudanese to the right) who drilled, inspired, and led their troops to remarkable victories in the face of overwhelming odds. They were these who unflappably ordered their men to fix bayonets when they ran out of ammunition and to counter-charge the final wave of Dervish attacks, driving them back. This was some leadership. I would venture to say that it was really the junior officers like Lt. Hussein who ended up saving Kitchener's hide.
Years later, when Teddy Roosevelt met Kitchener just prior to the Great War, when the Hero of Omdurman was on the verge of being appointed Minister for War, the ex-Rough Rider and former President was not impressed. He described the field marshal as a dull tool, devoid of imagination, and coasting on the laurels won by others. It was an opinion shared by many of his contemporaries. One general said he was smart enough to be the luckiest soldier in the army.
Would a night attack have made a difference?
Several of the Khalifa's emirs had urged him to launch his attack on the night of 1/2 September. They reasoned that this was the only way to overcome the advantage the Anglo-Egyptians had in firepower; to sneak up on them and surprise them in the dark. There were several factors working in favor of this argument: The plain around the allied camp was crisscrossed in khors, right up to the edge of the zariba. Osman Digna had used this infiltration tactic successfully several times against the British, the Italians and the Abyssinians before. The nature of the ground, in fact, was such that even with the vast size of the Khalifa's army, tens of thousands could have been hidden until the last minute. Indeed, even in the light of day, thousands were concealed from Kitchener.That the moon was nearly full and the sky clear might have made this night attack more difficult without discovery by the enemy. But even under a full moon, distances are hard to judge and the eyes play tricks. Also the moonlight may have allowed the Ansar rubs to make their way forward in coordination better. And the men were highly skilled at quiet movement and infiltration tactics. They were born commandos. They could have pulled it off.
A night attack was the one thing, too, that Kitchener was most afraid of. His men were alert but jumpy, expecting one all night. So the specter of tens of thousands of sword wielding Dervishes leaping out the ground just a few yards from their positions would have unnerved even the most veteran soldiers. And they would have had only a few dozen yards in which to stop them with firepower, not 3,000.
But for some reason, the Khalifa was not confident in the ability of his army to sneak up on the enemy. He may have been unsettled by the probing searchlights of the gunboats, thinking they would have been able to see all. Indeed, they might have been able to catch fleeting movement, but even with searchlights, the tactical situation was more precarious for the Anglo-Egyptians at night.
In the end, Abdullah was swayed against a night attack by his arrogant brother, Osman Sheikh ed-Din (the same who broke off from the first attack with 15,000 men in pursuit of the 900 Egyptian cavalry at the beginning of the battle and was a half-hour late at the conclusion). Ed-Din told his brother that a victory stolen in the dark held no glory for Allah, and that they would more assured of God's help in the full light of day.
But history might have been very different if the Khalifa had told his brother to shut up. Just as King Philip VI should have ignored his impetuous and stupid brother, Alencon, about honor and God being on their side at Crecy five centuries before, Abdullah should have ignored his. Another example of the hazards of nepotism.
Logistics
Of all the factors that assured the ultimate success of this two year campaign, logistics was right up at the top. If the army itself was the tip of the spear, as the tired old metaphor goes, the supply chain was the shaft. And the Anglo-Egyptian organization, planning and engineering was responsible. That they had built a railroad 220 miles across scorching desert from Wadi Halfa to Abu Hamed in just ten months, sinking wells and fighting off Dervish raids as they went is a phenomenal engineering marvel by itself. They also managed to build and haul nine warships and hundreds of supply vessels up past four cataracts of the Nile. And there were the magazines, supply dumps, and hospitals established at critical points on islands along the over 800 mile advance. The Omdurman campaign was a logistical wonder, a testament to the industrial might of the British Empire.Ammunition, food, water, and every sort of supply and support were never a question for Kitchener's force. At least as the campaign unfolded. Ammunition became a problem at the end of the battle as MacDonald's force, out on its own, started to run out of it.
Training and Morale
Both sides also enjoyed an amazing degree of military training and professionalism. It went without saying that the British regiments and Royal Navy performed admirably. But the Egyptian Army, in particular the Sudanese regiments, were also a far cry from the dispirited rabble of fellahin that had been overcome by the Mahdi a decade-and-a-half before. They were, it is true, trained and led at thetop by professional British officers, but the bulk of their company officers and NCOs were native Egyptians and Sudanese.
It was little wonder that the Sudanese regiments in particular had little trouble in recruiting captured Mahdist soldiers into their ranks after each battle; their foes saw that their African brothers were far better cared for than the Khalifa had done for them. Moreover, since most of the Sudanese were from southern tribes, who had been enslaved by Muslim Arabs for centuries, there was not a lot of loyalty among the Sudanese of the Ansar. Even at the battles toward the end of the campaign, at the Atbara and Omdurman, when British regiments joined the expedition, the Sudanese troops especially took the main brunt of the fighting and, at Omdurman, saved Kitchener from his own blunder.
On the Dervish side, too, though they were not as well-equipped or organized as the Anglo-Egyptians, the soldiers of the Ansar displayed a remarkable level of bravery and professionalism. They responded to orders quickly. They moved silently. They were quick to change front. And they were ingenious at tactics of infiltration and maneuver. Most of the Ansar at Omdurman had enjoyed sixteen years of almost continuous victory over all of their foes. Up until 1896, they had seemed invincible. And that gave them a sense of superiority in going into battle. The earlier defeats of this latest campaign they chalked up to the fact that they had gone on the defensive, and not employed the aggressive, all-out charge that had brought them uninterrupted victories before. So on the eve of Omdurman, they were confident that the attack the next day would bring them the same success they were used to. In a way, they were in the same over-confident position that the French were in on the eve of Blenheim two hundred years before.
Wargame Considerations
At first, given the completely lopsided result of the battle and the campaign, it would seem that Omdurman is not suitable for a satisfying, even-handed wargame. Who would want to play the Khalifa's side, only to see his pieces flicked away by overwhelming firepower? However, this battle, as we've seen, was a far closer run affair than the outcome would indicate. Kitchener made some critical tactical mistakes, endangering his entire army. And the Khalifa had some options open to him he eschewed. Designing a game to take these into account could make for a very interesting afternoon.
Night Attack Scenario
One option for an Omdurman game would allow for a night attack on the part of the Mahdist player. This was the one event that Kitchener was most worried about. Rules would, obviously, involve greatly reduced ranges on fire. Given that it was nearly a full moon on a clear night, the visibility for movement of forces was not so greatly restricted as a pitch black night would have presented.Hidden Movement
Such a game should provide for hidden movement. Even if a night attack were not a feature of the game, hidden movement would have been a relevant factor. Desert warfare has often been likened to naval war, and the critical factor in naval combat has always been reconnaissance and movement. The desert around the Omdurman battlefield was riven with shallow khors and rocky hills, providing much cover to very large formations. As we have seen, Kitchener was completely surprised by the Khalifa's second attack. Had he properly used his cavalry to see if the coast was clear, he might not have exposed his army to attack in detail. As it was, he fell right into the Khalifa's trap. When Kitchener ordered everybody to start moving south toward Omdurman, there were still some 40,000 fresh enemy troops in four large formations hidden on three sides of his widely dispersed 25,000. Had it not been for the cool courage and quick-thinking of his officers and soldiers (especially the Sudanese), he would have handed Queen Victoria a disaster to make Isandhlwana look like a stubbed toe. He was, as many of his fellow officers commented, the luckiest soldier in the army.So hidden movement and reconnaissance rules would make an Omdurman game highly interesting, giving the Khalifa player a distinct advantage to weigh against the firepower edge of the Kitchener player.
Ammunition
While ammo supply would not have been such an issue for the Anglo-Egyptian troops inside the zariba, close as they were to their supply fleet on the Nile, once they started moving out onto the open plain, it did become a factor. As we've seen, MacDonald's brigade, fighting off both Yaqub's and Osman ed-Din's attacks almost alone, nearly ran out of ammunition and were saved in the nick of time by the arrival of Wauchope's brigade. So an Omdurman game should provide for limited firing rounds.Command and Control
Thanks to the organizational structure of the British Army, Kitchener enjoyed an institutional advantage in controlling the movement of his own forces. He was, thanks to heliograph on the field, able to quickly send messages and redeploy his forces. And, even though his judgment could be questioned, he was a a brave soldier and a "lead from the front" kind of officer, riding all over the battlefield to manage it directly.The Khalifa, on the other hand, while he enjoyed unwavering loyalty on the part of his commanders, as well as a considerable degree of initiative on their part, did not have as tight a control of the movement of his widely dispersed divisions. Operating on the exterior lines (as Lee had had to do at Gettysburg), it took much longer for him to get messages to some of his commanders. Unfortunately, his plans were too complicated for his communications and the final, uncoordinated charges were useless.
A game could use a chit system to simulate this slow transmission of orders. Or dice or some other randomizing algorithm could determine whether orders were delivered, understood or if certain units moved on command.
Morale
At Omdurman both sides were feeling very high morale. Even the previously derided Egyptian regiments had found confidence in their reformed army and professionalism, and the long string of victories they had enjoyed during the campaign. And the Dervishes were admired by the normally racist and dismissive British for their incredible courage and discipline. So give everyone the highest morale. But maybe give the British, the Sudanese, Broadwood's Egyptian Cavalry and the Mahdists just a little higher.Big round of applause for everybody.
Orders of Battle
The following OOBs were derived from Donald Featherstone's "Omdurman 1898" As always, the first column is color-coded in the uniform coat color of the regiment.The strengths for the Khalifa's Ansar are also derived from Featherstone, who accessed the British Army intelligence records registered in Cairo in 1899. The Mahdist army was loosely organized in "rubs" or "quarters", equivalent roughly to Western brigades, and so I have used modern military symbols, as if. These rubs varied considerably in size. Each was composed of both foot spearmen (also armed with medieval swords and shields); jihadiya, armed with a variety of firearms from captured Remington rifles down to ancient muskets and "elephant guns"; and mounted warriors, also armed with medieval spears and swords.
Reference
Armstong, Karen, "Fields of Blood: Religion and the History of Violence", Anchor Books, 2015, ISBN 978-0-307-94696-6
Barthorp, Michael, "War on the Nile: Britain, Egypt and the Sudan 1882-1898", Blandford Press, 1984, ISBN 0-7137-1858-7
Churchill, Winston S., "The River War", 1902, ISBN 1330407768
Featherstone, Donald, "Omdurman 1898: Kitchener's Victory in the Sudan", Osprey, 1994, ISBN 978-1-85532-368-1
Morris, Edmund, "Colonel Roosevelt", Random House, 2001, ISBN 978-0-375-75707-5 used only for its interesting observations made by Theodore Roosevelt about Kitchener's military acumen.
The Highlander: The Regimental Journal of the Highlanders (Seaforth, Gordons and Camerons) Summer 1998, Vol. 4 No. 1
Online:
Johnson, Doug, http://www.savageandsoldier.com/articles.html
Schonfield, David, "Battle of Omdurman", History Today http://www.historytoday.com/david-shonfield/battle-omdurman
Maxim Machine Gun: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxim_gun
5 inch BL howitzer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BL_5-inch_howitzer
12 pdr 12 cwt gun https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QF_12-pounder_12_cwt_naval_gun
6 pdr naval gun https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QF_6_pounder_Nordenfelt
© Copyright 2015, Jeffery P. Berry Trust, all rights reserved. No part of this post may be used for re-publication or re-posting without documented permission from the Jeffery P. Berry Trust, which may be obtained by e-mailing jeffery.p.berry@comast.net. However, feel free to link to this site as a resource from related sites.
I've been checking the website every few days, and was rewarded today with a great write-up of a truly obscure battle. Thanks for the hard work!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Frogfan. I'm delighted that you've been checking so often. Now I have to start on the next one.
DeleteOMG this post is MASSIVE no wonder it took so long. And on top of that it is AWESOME.
ReplyDeleteAnother well thought out and presented battle piece.
ReplyDeleteAbout Kitchener: I think one of the reasons he was so lucky, or in command at Omdurman, was probably because he might have been a better politician than a general. The fact that he primarily used his egyptian and sudanese troops, (as he should, after all, he was operating as the Sirdar in the Sudan), and send home his british troops as soon as he did not need them, makes the point. Several other prominent Victorian soldiers would probably not have done the same.
That may very well be. Kitchener did consider himself an astute politician, though Teddy Roosevelt and Churchill were not much impressed with his skill in that arena either. It may be that he sent the British regiments back quickly because the Government were not going to pay for them to be there any longer than what was necessary (there were the same political pressures back then to disengage from foreign wars as there are today). They were deployed reluctantly in the first place and only in the last months of the two year campaign, so they were on temporary loan to the Egyptian government.
DeleteA small detachment of British troops accompanied Kitchener up the Nile to Fashoda in the following year to confront a French expedition there, but most of the force on that trip were Sudanese, Kitchener's crack troops. And as soon as Kitchener had tea with the French, he left, leaving the negotiations to diplomats in London and Paris.
Hi Jeff very well done job!!! Just a note; the very first defeat suffered by Dervishes is at Agordat, against the Italina Army, as it is depicted in the game ASCARI edited by Acies and whose designer is... me!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Marco. And thanks for that detail. I just edited the text from "the Mahdists had enjoyed continuous victory" to "...almost continuous victory...". I must look at your game.
DeleteThank you Jeff once more!
DeleteWow Jeff, you've outdone yourself with this one. Great detail, and I can't recommend Churchill's The River War enough for anybody interested in this little known war, it truly is Obscure.
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to the next one.
HA! Thanks so much, Bill. I did have fun doing this, though it took longer. I'd love to get a hold of Churchill's first version of his time in the Sudan, which came out in 1899. Apparently he was a lot more critical of Kitchener in that one so that, when he published his second edition in 1902, he had made the political decision to edit out the snarkiness. And nobody could do snark like Winston.
DeleteJust started to lay the groundwork on my next piece, which looks like it's going to be Arcola 1796 (a hundred years before). I started building the maps last night. Need to go back to familiar Napoleonic country.
Jeff, the 1899 edition of The River War is available online at archive.org,
DeleteVolume 1: https://archive.org/details/1899RiverWarVol1
and Volume 2: https://archive.org/details/1899RiverWarVol2
Churchill was an adrenaline junkie and his early writings are must reads for any fan of military history.
Thank you, Bill, for that link. I shall read it and add it to my list of references above.
DeleteThis was a great read, Jeff. Thanks so much for these write-ups, all of them are very enjoyable and quite informative. The only I really knew about Omdurman was in Korda's adaptation of The Four Feathers, and Hew Strachan remarks about the experience of Kitchener (and other British commanders) in the British brush wars of the late 19th century.
ReplyDeleteThank you back, Miguel, for your kind compliments. I have to say that even though it's 76 years old, that Alexander Korda movie, The Four Feathers, really holds up and is better than the later remake. The fact that the Omdurman battle scene was filmed on the actual site and with members of the British Army made it more realistic.
DeleteBy far the most intriguing (and most analytical) text I have ever read about Omdurman, if not about any colonial battle.
ReplyDeleteCongrats Jeff, about your research and trouble and effort to present all the factors that really weighed.
Thank you, Nikolaos. Each one of these articles takes me months of research, writing, and creating the maps, during which time I lose myself in the subject. I would do it if no one read them. But that thoughtful people like you do amplifies my pleasure.
DeleteJeff Berry; Thank you for this article, precise explanations, and details of this little heralded battle. I was particularly interested in learning of it, because my Great Grandfather, Joseph Burton was involved, and once he left (aboard ship) from a port in Wales, was never heard from again. He had just been married to Mary Grant, and their wedding certificate shows that Joseph was 19 years, & a Pvt in the 21st Hussars quartered at Piershill Barracks. His company was marched from Edinburgh Scotland to the port, only three weeks after his wedding. I understand that the Hussars were amalgamated into the Lancers for the Omdurman Battle. I plan on seeking out some of the reference books you have listed to gain more knowledge. Thank you again.
ReplyDeleteSo happy to get this comment from you, Charles. You are the second person I have heard from whose ancestor fought at this battle (the other being the great grandson of one of the officers in the 9th Sudanese Regt, Yahya Hussein). I am currently working on an American Civil War battle, Chickamauga, where my own ancestor fought on the Union side. It makes this whole endeavor even more rewarding. Thank you for your thoughts.
Delete